Federal court denies special counsel access to Rep. Perry’s 2020 election


A federal appeals court in Washington, DC, last week denied special counsel Jack Smith access to messages that Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) sent to members of Congress and the Trump White House about the 2020 election.

The DC Circuit Court of Appeals dealt the setback to Smith after a three-judge panel found his office’s request for the records were out of bounds due to constitutional protections afforded to Perry, court filings show.

“While elections are political events, a Member’s deliberation about whether to certify a presidential election or how to assess information relevant to legislation about federal election procedures are textbook legislative acts,” Judge Neomi Rao wrote in a Sept. 5 opinion unsealed Wednesday.

“Representative Perry’s conversations with other Members concerned the passage of proposed legislation as well as the exercise of the constitutional duty to certify the electoral votes from the 2020 election,” she added. “These communications were privileged, and we leave it to the district court to implement this holding on a communication-by-communication basis.”

The panel’s decision was the first major blow to Smith’s office as it seeks evidence to prosecute former President Donald Trump for his efforts to remain in power following his loss to Joe Biden, which ended in a mob storming the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

“This decision is a tremendous victory for the Constitution, and for all Americans who have been targeted by the Biden Administration’s continued abuse of power,” Jay Ostrich, a spokesman for Perry, told the Post in a statement.


Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.)
A federal appeals court in Washington, DC, last week denied special counsel Jack Smith access to communications that Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) sent about the 2020 election.
AP

Special counsel Jack Smith
The DC Circuit Court of Appeals dealt the setback to Smith after a three-judge panel found his office’s request for the records were out of bounds due to constitutional protections.
AP

US District Judge Neomi Rao
Rao was appointed by former President Donald Trump,
CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

“The court soundly rejected the Biden Justice Department’s contention that simple fact-finding inquiries made by a Member of Congress need to be pre-authorized by some committee or ordained by the House to be protected from compelled disclosure by the Executive Branch,” he added.

“This decision firmly establishes that the Executive Branch can’t prevent Congressman Perry, or any Member of Congress, from doing their job by having internal communications with other Members, or with their own staff — in this case, looking into certification of the presidential election.”

Smith’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.)
“This decision is a tremendous victory for the Constitution, and for all Americans who have been targeted by the Biden Administration’s continued abuse of power,” Jay Ostrich, a spokesman for Perry, told the Post in a statement.
Getty Images

Rao, who was appointed by Trump, joined Judge Greg Katsas, also a Trump appointee, and Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson, an appointee of former President…



Read More: Federal court denies special counsel access to Rep. Perry’s 2020 election

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More